New study on deviance distraction, age, working memory and response inhibition to be published in Developmental Psychology

A recent study by Alicia Leiva, Pilar Andrés, Mateu Servera, Frederick Verbruggen and Fabrice Parmentier reports the results of a study comparing children, young adults and elderly adults in a cross-modal oddball task, a working memory task and a stop-signal task. Data collected from one hundred and twenty participants show that deviance distraction does not result from a temporary inhibition of motor processes and does not correlate with working memory capacity.

This new study is to appear in the prestigious journal Developmental Psychology edited by the American Psychological Association and ranked 4th best journal in developmental psychology internationally.

Congratulations to Alicia on this fifth accepted publication as part of her doctoral dissertation!

Abstract: Sounds deviating from an otherwise repeated or structured sequence capture attention and affect performance in an ongoing visual task negatively, testament to the balance between selective attention and change detection. While deviance distraction has been the object of much research, its modulation across the life span has been more scarcely addressed. Recent findings suggest possible connections with working memory and response inhibition. In this study we measured the performance of children, young and older adults in a cross-modal oddball task (deviance distraction), a working memory task (working memory capacity) and a response inhibition task (ability to voluntarily inhibit an already planned action) with the aim to establish the contribution of the latter two to the first. Older adults exhibited significantly more deviance distraction than children and young adults (who did not differ from each other). Working memory capacity mediated deviance distraction in children and older adults (though in opposite directions) but not in young adults. Response inhibition capacities did not mediate deviance distraction in any of the age groups. Altogether the results suggest that while the increase in deviance distraction observed in old age may partly reflect the relative impairment of working memory mechanisms, there is no straightforward and stable relation between working memory capacity and deviance distraction across the life span. Furthermore, our results indicate that deviance distraction is unlikely to reflect the temporary inhibition of responses.

This study is the fruit of the ongoing collaboration between the Neuropsychology and Cognition Group at the University of the Balearic Islands and Prof. Verbruggen's research group at the University of Exeter.

This study is the fruit of the ongoing collaboration between the Neuropsychology and Cognition Group at the University of the Balearic Islands and Prof. Verbruggen's research group at the University of Exeter.

Fabrice Parmentier ranked among the top researchers in Spain

A ranking just published by the DIH Group lists Fabrice Parmentier in the top 15 Experimental Psychology researchers in Spain, and best Experimental Psychology researcher across the Balearic Islands.

The ranking takes into account researchers' h-index (measure of the impact of their publications, calculated based on publications indexed by the Science Citation Index Expanded and Social Sciences Citation Index) and their positioning relative to the h-index of other researchers within a specific field.

DIH's ranking of Experimental Psychology researchers in Spain

DIH's ranking of Experimental Psychology researchers in Spain

Launching our online study of mindfulness

Take part in our online survey and get your personalized results and profile!

Our study takes about 25 minutes to complete and will allow us to study the relationship between mindfulness, meditation, distraction, attentional control, anxiety and depression.

This study forms the first phase of a project funded by the Bial Foundation and awarded to Fabrice Parmentier (project leader), Pilar Andrés, Mauro García-Toro, Javier García-Campayo, and Margalida Gili-Planas. 

Our first study in the new Laboratory of Experimental Psychology: Over 100 participants in 4 days!

New Laboratory of Experimental Psychology

New Laboratory of Experimental Psychology

This week saw the launch of a new study on attention and mindfuless carried out by final year projects Catalina Adrover, Sofía Soto and Mar Niñals, with the additional help of Inés Kefauver and Alicia Leiva, and under the direction of Fabrice Parmentier. These students did a great job recruiting and testing over 100 participants on 7 questionnaires and 4 computerized cognitive task... in just 4 days! This study was also the first our group carried out in the new Laboratory of Experimental Psychology.

The data collected will allow us to study the relationship between dispositional mindfulness, attentional control, emotional regulation, mental dispersion and distraction in four cognitive tasks. Mindfulness can be defined as"paying attention in a particular way; on purpose, in the present moment, and non judgmentally" (Jon Kabat-Zin). While some studies have found positive effects of mindfulness induced by meditation practice or training programs on some attentional functions, little is known regarding the effect of dispositional mindfulness, that is, the level of mindfulness characteristics naturally exhibited by individuals. Our study will explore this issue across three distinct final year projects, each focusing on a different angle of research.    

Deviant sounds yield distraction irrespective of the sounds’ informational value

A new study by Parmentier and just accepted for publication by the Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance shows that, contrary to previous claims, deviance distraction (the distraction yielded by unexpected changes in a sequence of task-irrelevant sounds) is not conditioned by the warning value of these sounds. Parmentier highlights how such conclusion was based on an analysis of the data that failed to take into account the slowing of responses induced by the witholding of responses on catch trials. These results demonstrate that deviance distraction is not limited to oddball tasks where irrelevant stimuli fulfill the role of warning stimuli and reinforces the oddball task as a valid method to study deviance distraction.

Reference:
Parmentier, F. B. R (in press). Deviant sounds yield distraction irrespective of the sounds’ informational value. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.

Abstract:
Oddball studies show that rare and unexpected changes in an otherwise repetitive or structured sequence of task-irrelevant sounds (deviant sounds among standard sounds) ineluctably break through attentional filters and yield longer response times in an ongoing task. While this deviance distraction effect has generally been thought of as an involuntary and adaptive phenomenon, recent studies questioned this view by reporting that deviance distraction is observed when sounds predict the occurrence of a target stimulus (informative sounds) but that is disappears when sounds do not convey this information (uninformative sounds). Here I challenge this conclusion and suggest that the apparent absence of deviance distraction with uninformative sounds results in fact from two opposite effects:  Deviance distraction when the previous trial involved a target and required responding, and a speeding up of responses by deviant sound following trials involving no target and requiring the withholding of responses.  Data from a new experiment, new analyses of the data from three earlier studies, and the modelling of these data, all converge in suggesting the existence of deviance distraction impervious to the sounds’ informational value. These results undermine the proposition of a late top-down control mechanism gating behavioral distraction as a function of the sounds’ informative value.